Evaluating Fake Engagement: Temporary Fix or Sustainable Strategy?

Fake engagement is here to stay in the digital marketing and everyone wants their slice of the action. The temptation to increase visibility and improve engagement metrics rapidly, however, also leads many brands and content creators into the realm of artificial interaction, a strict no-no in any ethical-conduct book or recommendation guide going around for social media tactics. As much as Fake Engagement can be a quick fix to boost numbers on followers, likes and comments the question mark about its long term viability remains. Brands will have to decide if they can make a long-term plan work by cutting corners with fake engagement in order to grow, and even develop that brand relationship.

To What Extent Fake Engagement Has an Impact Over Visibility

Fake engagement is traditionally associated with the act of buying or using bots to boost likes, comments, followers and other forms of digital interaction to create the illusion that more people like a piece of content than do in reality. Which means brands can achieve a quick visibility boost because most platforms like Instagram, Facebook and Youtube for instance have the tendency to promote a content that seems to be engaging an audience. Fake Engagement: Fake likes, fake views, and others can sky rocket the online presence of any new brand or creator looking to make it in a market that is over-saturated.

A Statista report in 2020 showed that over 45% influencers admitted they used fake engagements to increase their visibility. The premise of this approach is by aiming for better engagement metrics, these platforms will be more likely to promote the content further which in turn could lead to real people seeing and engaging with it as well. A large number of likes and comments will help a post in being displayed on the explore page of social media platforms, increasing the chance for real users to see it.

The short-term appeal of fake engagement is plain to see, but can a more sustainable fix be offered up in its place? While fake likes or followers can help a brand to improve reach in the short-term, they do not equate to authentic audience relationships, which may ultimately prove detrimental to campaign marketing efficiency.

  • Content-marketing agency BrightEdge offers some interesting (I want to say flabbergasting) infographics on the short-term impact of fake social-media engagement on visibility.
  • ! [Click Here to View Graph on Fake Engagement vs Visibility](https://example.com/fake-engagement-visibility-graph
  • 45% of influencers used fake engagement to boost visibility in 2020
  • After buying fake engagement, brands saw a 30% increase in their posts being picked up on the explore page
  • This graph shows the visibility bump most brands get right after using fake engagement, but it also asks about their sustainability over the long-run.

Fake engagement and audience relationships

A fake engagement can make it look like you have boosted the BRAND VISIBILITY However, it is not QUITE helping build real audience relationship. Think of the followers, likes and comments that are purchased through fake engagement services as not representing real consumers  there is no real activity occurring. Consumers behavior shows that people interact more with brands that have some real and authentic connection with them via common values & emotional content. A Buffer study of 2020 also showed that 68% of users chose to follow brands on being interactive by nature in the manner an ordinary person communicates.

The risk with this approach is the perception of performing as poor imitation of fake engagement over time will not be lost on users, who absorb the difference in that fabricated view. Brands that rely heavily on fake engagement will face a real challenge when it comes to reputation management, probably as consumers catch on to the illusion. Not only does it lead to the lost of brand loyalty, but also, a brand that has could not maintain their credibility, will further slow down its growth or even worse; rot at the bottom with other labels.

The New Castle scam underscores a seemingly related paradox: the sustainability of fake engagement as a long-term strategy.

To determine if temporary can become a long-term solution, brands will need to evaluate just how sustainable fake engagement is. While a temporary increase in followers, likes or comments might lead to a quick success, without an authentic content strategy and engagement analysis, ot won’t mean anything for long-term growth. Hootsuite said in 2020, with employing fake engagement, brands suffered a 25% drop in real audience interaction after six months.

Fake engagement they will give you initial visibility but it will not bring you any brand growth. Sustainable success will come from engagement, content that relates to their audience and growth strategies built on real relationships. A study conducted in 2021 has shown that 52% of brands have noticed a considerable increase in customer retention and brand loyalty by transitioning from the fake engagement to authentic means.

  • In this graphic, Before you can determine how to fix a bad engagement solution like buying fake followers or likes…medium.com
  • ! Pie Chart — Fake vs Authentic Engagement
  • Real engagement dropped by 25% over 6 months of relying on fake interaction.
  • 52% increase in stickiness (customer loyalty) for brands that redefined their engagement strategies to focus on authenticity.–taskId

A visual representation of the immobilizing yet equal power fake and authentic engagement on brand performance – illustrating the need for genuine word-of-mouth.

Fake Engagement  The Bad Side

May you benefit from the experience Brands should avoid fake engagement with their audiences not only because they cannot have truly meaningful audience relationships but for a number of other reasons. Social media platforms have started to crack down on accounts that engage in fake engagement as well knowing the damage it does to their ecosystems. Instagram, for example, has been in a battle to purify fake followers and likes; YouTube is not far behind and it rids itself of fraudulent views. Instagram in 201so reported deleting more than 10 million fake accounts, some of which had been employed to artificially inflate the number of Instagram followers for influencers.

Brands who indulge in fake engagement run the risk of getting their metrics zeroed out, or even worse partial or total bans from platforms. Fake engagement could hurt a brand in terms of its long-term sustainability as social networks begin to place more value on real-life engagement. As Platforms And Consumers Grow Wiser To Artificial Metrics, Reputation management will become much harder.

The Future of Engagement Metrics & Digital Marketing

Going forward, engagement metrics will remain an important part of digital marketing, but the value will switch towards natural interactions. The only content that will be rewarded in platforms is one which provides real audience relationships and create actual relevancy to their lives will make them earn it. Alienating interaction: Artificial engagement may work in the short term, but they will be diminishing returns in the long run as social media algorithms catch on and punish fake engagement.

In order to stand the test of time, brands will need to implement sustainable long-term growth strategies. For example, not only just creating a solid content strategy, getting the look at the consumer behavior and another data-driven insights for decreased marketing efficacy. Brands focused on sustainability and brand loyalty will have a competitive advantage in an over saturated digital ecosystem by creating genuine engagement.

Sprout Social saw a 60% year-over-year increase in launches of Imagability campaigns during the second quarter of 2021, indicating that hundreds of brands are doubling-down on audience engagement and real interactions through community-building on SproutPhoto Credit: Weegee6706_ssIconModulesefforts, rather than settling for short-term visibility boosts. As the digital marketing trend evolves, we can expect to see the necessity for fake engagement decrease and brands are on a rise of seeing a long-term growth solutions rather than quick fixes.

Fake Engagement- a low cost, quick win for brands to generate great metrics in the short term but ultimately longer term very flawed. For brands focused on sustained growth and building deep relationships with their audience, the need for real engagement strategies that create brand loyalty and produce actual results will not be changing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

sixteen + three =